|FOUR PAWS ($150 or more)|
|Peter and Ellen Briggs|
|Maria and Ken Pollack|
|Ellen Reese and Gary Stein|
|Barbara, Dan, Katy & Sam Yody|
|THREE PAWS ($100 to $149)|
|Diana and Lawrence Alpert|
|Yair and Judy Argon|
|Gary and Linda Dorey-Stein|
|Karen and Joan Garbeil|
|Michael and Selina Hoessly|
|Nora and Barry Kramer|
|Beth and David Mark|
|Karl and Dori Middleman|
|John Bryan III and Nancy Winkler|
|TWO PAWS ($50 to $99)|
|Judy and Art Axelrod|
|Mary and Iain Black|
|Glenn and Jennifer Cooper|
|Robby and Judy Freeman|
|Jay and Marya Margolis|
|Craig and Cary Sellers|
|Helene Feinberg Walker|
|Rick and Karen Wilson|
|ONE PAW (up to $49)|
|Lars Pace and Michelle Detwiler|
|David and Christine Hartzell|
|Hank and Barbara Holmes|
|Mary Anne Sheldon|
This year, member comments centered on trail improvement, mud issues, planting, hygiene and preservation of the grassy areas. Here are all the comments we received and our response:
Q#1: What projects do you think should be undertaken for the future?
Trail improvement: “Removing large pieces of gravel and finding more paw friendly alternatives”
Our response: We will continue to work with the Township on trail issues. With respect to the large less comfortable stones on the path at the far side of the park, the Township has found that trying to finish off paths using the fine gravel works on level paths but does not work on slopes, where gullies develop. We are exploring viable alternatives. Meanwhile, we have found that for humans, shoes with thicker soles help—and the dogs are free to go where they please!
Mud Problem/Planting Plans: “Center area of mucky water—plant?” ** “Less mud!” ** “Putting down stones or mulch to get rid of the mud.” ** “Mud control in far end of park near boardwalk” ** “Continue the good work on flooding & planting.” **
Our response: One of our top priorities is to continue ongoing planting efforts to reduce mud, replace tree cover, and enhance the wildlife habitat. We plan to continue our planting program, expanding to the area around the blue Dog Park sign as well as in the wildlife garden, riparian areas, and the boggy areas. We will seek out expert ecological advice on use of mulch and stones/gravel to reduce mud.
Hygiene/Grass Preservation: ** “Protection of the grassy areas.” ** “Small signs advising people to stay on the path except for poop pick-up. I’m thinking of a few signs along pathway such as “keep off the grass” signs you see around town. I believe many people come to the park who do not belong to our association and may or may not adhere to our rules and may or may not have off-leash permits for their dogs. I’ve heard people say they think they don’t need to clean up poop when it’s up on the hill or in the middle of the meadow. They do! But a little signage might reinforce rules to non-members and casual drop-in visitors.”
Our response: Good suggestions, which will be considered. FYI we consider the addition of signage something of a balancing act. The up side of signage is that it may influence behavior in a good direction; the down side is that signage tends to undermine one of our main missions which is to preserve the natural atmosphere of the park. Our experience with park signage to date suggests that its effectiveness is less that one would hope.
Amenities: “Dog water fountain and rinsing station” ** “trash can deeper in the park”
Our response: As always, when it comes to park amenities we try to balance member need, the cost and maintenance burden on the township, and our goal of maintaining the wild, “walk in the woods” feel of our park. At this time, our thinking is a more minimalist approach on such conveniences best fulfills our mission.
Q#2: Any other comments or thoughts you would like us to consider?
“Although I don’t have a dog, I support the park’s promotion of and use of native plants.” ** “Love the park and love the improvements, including the respite garden and memorial trunk.” ** “It’s a wonderful park!” ** “Thank you!” ** “Keep up the great work!” ** “Keep up the good work—well done on improving the park!” ** “Thanks for running the park.” ** ”Thanks for all you do!!” ** “Thank you for creating and maintaining a lovely respite for humans and hounds!” ** “We absolutely love the creek! Thank You.
Our response: Thanks for the positive feedback—it keeps us energized!
In 2018 we held a total of 7 official work days – three dedicated to planting and maintenance, and 4 to cutting down our ever-persistent crop of invasive Japanese Knotweed. Many, many thanks to our 14 wonderful volunteers, Judy Argon, Karen Barsotti, Ellen Briggs, Helen Chen, Art Gold, Karen Hinckley, Gary Kingaffer, June Lauer, Orsi Lazar, Linda Pitt, Ellen Reese, Mary Ann Sheldon, Christel Urmenhazi, and Helene Feinberg Walker who donated a total of 84 hours to our ongoing efforts to keep our park green and growing! We should also note that, in addition to our official work days, ad hoc volunteers donated many additional but uncounted hours to general upkeep and maintenance (mostly weeding and invasive removal). An additional thank you to you unsung heroes! And last but not least, Matt Berk, Rich Cutshall, and Gary Stein have consistently been there to help with skilled projects such as gate latch repairs and affixing signage
In 2017, our volunteers once again surpassed expectation. During the year, we held 10 formal pre-announced work days. Our work included:
- Wildlife and Respite Garden maintenance
- Control of Japanese Knotweed, an invasive plant that threatens the park’s ecological health
- Planting new native shrubs in the low lying areas of the park in an effort to reduce mud
Seventeen of our members participated in these work days. Including additional help from several young people fulfilling community service requirements, we logged a total of 134 volunteer work hours for the year! Thanks a million to member volunteers Judy and Yair Argon, Ellen Briggs, Paula Burns, David and Tal Coren, Rich Cutshall, Michelle Detwiler, Pinkie Hamilton, Karen Hinckley, Tessa Lamont Siegel, June Lauer, Max Perelman, Linda Pitt, Ellen Reese, Cary Sellers, and Elaine Stern for all their hard work. We also had a number of non-official work days so our actual volunteer work hours probably total around 160.
Our holiday lunch will take place on Wednesday, December 5, at 12:30 pm at the A La Maison restaurant, 53 W. Lancaster Ave, Ardmore PA.
If you’d like to attend our holiday lunch, choose one Entrée per person. Send your choice, along with your check for $35 per person payable to Friends of WMC Park, to Ellen Reese, Treasurer, 727 Stradone Rd, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004:
Entrees (choose one per person):
- Quiche du Jour (Chef’s Choice)
- Grilled Shorty – Signature Burgundy Braised Black Angus Short Rib Pieces & Gruyere Cheese Grilled on Toasted Brioche
- Traditional Croque Madame Or Croque Monsieur Open Faced Sandwich
- Cheese Omelet
- Poulet Maison – Pan Seared Boneless, Skinless Pounded Chicken Breast Served With Béchamel
- Crepe du Jour – Selection of Two (2) Traditional French Crepes (Chef’s Choice)
The lunch will also include soft drink, choice of Salade Maison or special house French fries, and a dessert.
Trouble in Paradise? Tips from Friends of West Mill Creek Park on how to handle dog aggression at the park
If you have an issue with an aggressive dog at the park . . .
- As a first step, try a polite and civil conversation with the owner of the dog you are concerned about. Sometimes a creative solution can be found. For instance, we had one situation that was resolved when the owner agreed to keep the dog muzzled while at the park. Or, if the problem is not severe, the owners could try a mutual agreement to keep on opposite sides of the park, or to visit the park at different times.
- If that does not work, especially if there is an injury to you or your dog, the next step is to notify Lower Merion Animal Control at 610-649-1000. Animal Control will send an officer to take your statement. (Note: The Lower Merion Department of Parks & Recreation administers the Off Leash Permit program, but they cannot take action absent a police report.)
- After you have given a statement to the police, you can proceed to notify Donna Heller, Director of the L.M. Department of Parks & Recreation, at email@example.com , or (610) 645-6220. Parks & Rec will review the situation and, if circumstances warrant, may revoke the off leash permit of the offending dog.
- In all cases where there has been an injury to a person or dog, it is a good idea to document that with photos and/or a visit to the doctor or vet (as the case may be).
If you are the owner of a dog that may have injured another dog or person at the park . . .
- After the dogs are safely separated, best practice is to contact the other owner, ask whether owner and dog are ok, and where appropriate offer to pay for any damage caused. This can be very hard because both you and the other owner may be upset, but apologies or expressions of concern go a long way to ease tensions and promote a civil atmosphere at the park.
- Just because you have an incident does not mean your dog’s off leash permit can or should be revoked. Accidents happen. But remember . . . NOT ALL DOGS ARE SUITABLE FOR OFF LEASH DOG PARKS. A dog may be a fine dog and a beloved family member, but still not a good candidate for off leash privileges in a public park.
Role of Friends of West Mill Creek Park
To keep our dog park a friendly and welcoming place, concerns about habitually aggressive dogs must be addressed. Our policy is to rely on the police and township to referee disputes over dog aggression.
- Our organization is not trained or equipped to arbitrate disputes among dog park visitors. Our role in this area is strictly limited to providing educational information to help people resolve issues as amicably as possible through the proper channels.
- We cooperate with any inquiries about aggressive dog incidents from the police or the Lower Merion Department of Parks and Recreation.
See also our companion brochure, “Etiquette: 10 Tips for a Great Dog Park Experience,” for some really good general guidelines on avoiding common dog park problems. Copies are usually available in the kiosk, and it is also available under the “Gettin’ Along” tab on our website.
FOUR PAWS ($150 or more)
Peter & Ellen Briggs
Beth & David Mark
THREE PAWS (($100 to $149)
Judy & Yair Argon
Jay Bryan & Nancy Winkler
John & Jessica Cassimatis
Linda & Gary Dorey-Stein
Ellen Reese & Gary Stein
Sherry & Lewis Wexler
Karen Zimmerman & David Preefer
TWO PAWS ($50 to $99)
Arthur & Judy Axelrod
John & Barbara Barr
Iain & Mary Black
Karen & Joan Garbeil
Jay & Marya Margolis
Jill & Eric Sussman
Mark & Sonya Wassmansdorf
Rick & Karen Wilson
ONE PAW (up to $49)
Amy Cohen & Tom Waniewski
Michelle Detwiler & Lars Pace
2018 Friends of West Mill Creek Annual Member Survey
This year, member comments centered on trail improvements, safety, new planting, adding seating, and additional conveniences. Here are all the comments we received and our response:
Q#1: What projects do you think should be undertaken for the future?
Trail improvement: “We need gravel on the path from the entrance to the creek. It is always muddy” ** “Finish the stone path on the creek side of the park” ** “Pathway repair to encourage people to stay on the paths and protect the park.” ** “Replace the upper rock path after the board walk with smaller, more dog friendly rocks. I find myself avoiding the rock path, and walking on the side. My dog does also.”** “Adding new stones to low-lying muddy are near wooden walkway.”
Our response: We will continue to work with the Township on trail issues. With respect to the large less comfortable stones on the path at the far side of the park, the Township has found that trying to finish off paths using the fine gravel works on level paths but does not work on slopes, where gullies develop. We don’t have an alternative at this time. However, we have found that shoes with thicker soles help.
Planting: “Work with Township to replace fallen trees” ** “Continue planting to reduce mud and improve wildlife habitat.” ** “I love the Ellens’ recent idea of planting flowers at the base of the Mill Creek Dog Park sign—perhaps pachysandra or something that might stay lush year round.” ** “More planting of trees and shrubs, especially in the riparian area.” ** “Additional plantings for beauty and muddy area control, especially for repairing the riparian area.”**”I think a simple solution to the super-marshy lowland area in the middle of the loop is essentially making it a “bioswale”. Essentially water sucking vegetation that can be bought cheap and en masse. This will serve to dry out the area and help keep some mud off the more adventurous dogs.” ** “Consider other areas where wildflower seeds can be spread to make the park rich in cool plants and flowers.” ** “For immediate gratification, more flowering native plants would be nice. However, a wiser investment would be planting trees as recommended by the speaker from Longwood Gardens at the annual meeting.” **”Continued work to even better control the flooding problem would be great.”
Our response: One of our top priorities is to continue ongoing planting efforts to reduce mud, replace tree cover, and enhance the wildlife habitat. We will soon be doing planting under the Dog Park sign as well as in the wildlife garden, riparian areas, and the boggy areas.
Safety: “There are a few spots that dogs can get out of the park too easily. A “false” path leads up to that busy road. Can it be blocked or fencing put in at the top of the path? Also there is a rock and dirt pile high enough for a dog to climb and reach the road near the entrance.” **”More protective fencing in areas above creek to keep dogs in if they cross over creek and climb up towards the squash club, and anywhere to make it completely closed in and safe.” **”Do you suppose there is anything we can do as a group re the intersection of Old Gulph and Mill Creek Roads?”**”Can anything be done to counter the parking lot break-ins? Could donations pay for a camera system–or is that not likely to be effective?”
Our response: Regarding park fencing, the path that leads up to Mill Creek Road is a Bridlewild Trail and cannot be blocked off. As to the rock/dirt pile near the entrance, we have been discussing this with the Township for some years and there is some concern that excavating the pile will destabilize the wall. We are thinking of trying to plant a thick hedge around this area that would discourage dogs from running up there. We take dog safety seriously and in the past we added the entrance gate and extended existing park fencing for this reason. But unfortunately WMC Park cannot be completely fenced. We are planning to post signage that provides a warning to help ensure that all park users understand this. For those who cannot rely on their dog’s recall skills, there is a completely fenced dog park area at Rolling Hill Park.
** Regarding the intersection of Old Gulph and Mill Creek Roads, we contacted our Commissioner, Dan Bernheim. Dan contacted Officer Michael Sullivan, who deals with traffic issues at the L.M. Police Department, on our behalf. Officer Sullivan has told us that traffic signs and signals are subject to both Federal and State regulation. Under those regulations, neither traffic volume at the intersection nor incidence of relatable crashes qualify the intersection for an added stop sign or other traffic control device. He also told us that studies have shown that stop signs put up where people don’t expect them can actually cause more accidents than they prevent. So — added traffic signals at Old Gulph and Mill Creek is not an option for us at this point. Be cautious at the intersection!
**Regarding parking lot break-ins, we will run this idea by the township, but regretfully we think the most effective option is not to leave valuables in your car when visiting the park.
Seating: “Big stones for sitting at each stream entrance spot.”
Our response: We are all for this idea and will actively try to find additional sitting stones. (Turns out that rocks of the appropriate size are getting very difficult to find—last year we visited several quarries and found a total of two suitable stones which we placed at The Deep/North Beach.)
Additional conveniences: “Water station—fountain and dog water spout” ** “A hose to spray muddy dogs at the parking lot” ** “Addition of hose and spray nozzle at park entrance to wash off muddy pups!”
Our response: Unfortunately, running water in the park is impracticable at this time.
Hygiene: “Some persuasive educational approach to encourage dog owners to pick up their dogs’ poop–even when it’s off the path (since it goes into the watershed).
Our response: We have created a brochure on this subject that is available at the kiosk and on our website, and we issue reminders at our annual meeting and in our annual newsletter. We are very concerned about this and would welcome suggestions that would further address this issue!
Q#2: Any other comments or thoughts you would like us to consider?
“Love the stones at the North Beach.” ** “I LOVE THIS DOG & PEOPLE COMMUNITY! THANK YOU.” ** “We are appreciative of all the efforts that are being made on behalf of the Park.” ** “Thank you all very much for creating a sanctuary for dogs and their humans. We are all most appreciative.” ** “Thanks for all that you do for people and pets!” ** “Thanks for all you do!”
Our response: Thanks for the positive feedback – and we agree it’s all the dogs and all the people together as a community that makes our park so special.
2017 Friends of West Mill Creek Park Survey Results
- What projects do you think should be undertaken in the future?
Member survey comments: “Try to keep the park from having “mud pits” near boardwalk and between bench and entrance to creek.” ** “Get rid of the mud!” ** “More planting in center area to prevent “mudholes”—and would love more shrubbery to attract birds.”
Our response: Our number one priority is trying to address the mud in a way that benefits both ecological and practical concerns.
We have begun our campaign to reduce mud in an ecologically friendly way begun by planting bog-tolerant shrubs around the mud hole near the long boardwalk. If the shrubs grow and flourish, they should keep the dogs out of the water. We intend to keep on planting with the goal of providing food and cover to wildlife while keeping our dogs cleaner. Please note that we are moving ahead with this project in small increments rather than a mass planting effort all at once because these are difficult planting conditions and we expect to learn a lot by trial and error.
We hope you will understand that our park is in a floodplain, and part of its important ecological function is to absorb and filter storm water before it reaches the creek. Also, the seasonal pools of standing water are necessary to the reproduction of park amphibians, which in turn help control insect populations. Therefore, diverting all storm water directly into Mill Creek so that the park is always dry underfoot is not one of our goals; rather, we will try to strike a happy medium between ecological and practical concerns.
Member survey comments: “The stone pathways are not holding up. The wooden walkway is much better. Either extend the wooden walkway all the way round or add stone/metal/plastic frames for the gravel portion and add more gravel.” ** “Finish covering larger stones on path with small stones to protect dogs’ paws.”
Our Response: Parks & Rec tells us that extending the wooden walkway around the park is not practicable because of the high groundwater levels. Containing the gravel by adding frames is not a viable solution either. Because of the high volume of water runoff that flows over the park, the gravel moves, either burying the frame and making it useless, or leaving the frame projecting out of the ground which creates a tripping hazard. Similarly, finishing off the rocky part of the path is not an option. Parks & Rec has tried to do this kind of project in the past. They have found that the fine finishing gravel (which works pretty well on the flat parts of the path) isn’t effective on the sloping paths. It gets carved into gullies and then ultimately washes away.
Member survey comments: “A bench down near beach spot past the weed penitentiary area. A lot of people come down there to let dogs swim – maybe 2 rustic log-type benches. There is plenty of room.”
Our response: Great idea! We are currently discussing this with Parks & Rec.
Member survey comment: “Marking of parking spaces in the lot to maximize the number of cars.”
Our response: Great idea! We are currently discussing this with Parks & Rec.
Member survey comments: “I would like more money spent on enclosing the area. My dogs are ok but friends won’t come because they do not feel the property is secure.” ** “We have heard there’s a hole in stone wall that dogs can get through. Can this get checked out and repaired?”
Our response: We are very supportive of all reasonable measures to improve safety. We are currently looking at the possibility of some additional fencing and/or the planting of shrub hedges in areas of particular concern. However, it is important for everyone to understand that it not possible to enclose the park completely. Fencing cannot be installed either across the stream or in the area where the stream may flood while carrying debris. West Mill Creek Park is suitable only for those dogs whose owners can trust them off leash. A completely fenced area is available at Rolling Hill Park for dogs with less reliable recall skills.
As far as a hole in the stone wall, we aren’t aware of one, though there was an opening between the fence and stone wall that has been dealt with by the independent efforts of one of our members.
Member survey comment: “Periodic checks of creek’s toxicity.”
Our response: We spoke to the Department of Parks and Recreation and the Lower Merion Conservancy about this concern. The Lower Merion Conservancy monitors water quality in our stream monthly for indications of ecological stream health such as levels of dissolved oxygen and number of macro invertebrates living in the stream. The state department of natural resources also monitors for stream health from time to time. Tom Clark, Conservation Coordinator at the Lower Merion Conservancy, offered the opinion that the stream, while polluted from the point of view of ecological stream health, is not necessarily detrimental to dog health. He also noted that if we observe a “fish kill” (numerous fish floating on the surface) that is an indication of toxicity that definitely would be of concern for canine health. Finally, he noted that pollution levels are highest during and just after storms with lots of runoff entering the creek.
Mill Creek water is not safe for human consumption. No one we talked to is aware of any particular test for toxicity to dogs, but many of our canine dog park regulars have been drinking the water for their entire lifetimes with no apparent ill effects. If you are concerned, we suggest discussing this issue with your veterinarian.
To keep our stream (and all waterways in Lower Merion) as clean as possible, remember that chemical lawn fertilizers, pesticides, pollutants from cars, de-icing salt and yes, dog poop, are the most significant sources of stream pollution in our area. Dispose of all dog poop in the trash, and use chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and de-icing salt as little as possible (none at all would be great!)
Member survey comment: “Some people do not clean up after their dogs. I’ve heard people say – “It’s not on the path” – but they need to clean up anywhere in the park including sides and middle.”
Our response: You are so right! Dog poop is a major source of stream pollution and threatens the health of people and animals that use the stream. We hope all West Mill Creekers will take a look at our “Poop FAQs” sheet that is available on our website under the “Gettin’ Along” tab and in brochure form in the park kiosk. It answers a lot of the questions people have asked us in the past on this issue so please take a look!
Member survey comment: “Irises along the edge of the stream.”
Our response: Irises would be lovely! We are discussing feasibility with the member who suggested this.
- Any other comments or thoughts you would like us to consider?
Member comments: “Love the way the Respite Garden has filled out! Love the improved walking area—reduced mud and mud puddles.” **“You are doing a wonderful job!” ** “The Park looks beautiful!” ** “Thanks for all you do!” **“Thank you and our leadership for helping make the dog park a memorable part of our lives.” ** “You are doing a great job!!” ** “Thank you for everything you do for the park and for building community in our area!” ** “ No dog but I love the dog park. You have done an awesome job!”
Our response: Positive feedback is extremely encouraging and energizing to all on the Steering Committee. We thank all those volunteers and contributors who have helped make this happen and we also thank our survey respondents for the supportive comments on our efforts—we really appreciate it!
THANKS TO ALL WHO PARTICIPATED FOR RESPONDING TO OUR 2017 SURVEY!
Bad news first: As some of you know, a few days ago in the early afternoon, thieves smashed the window of a car parked in our Friends of WMC parking lot and stole a purse and cellphone. So, do be careful! (The advice of our police department is: if you must bring valuables to the park, try to take them with you or keep them out of sight.)
Now for some happier news:
WMC volunteers began work on our plan to plant bog-loving shrubs in or around low-lying areas in the main park. If the new plants thrive we will reduce our muddy-dog quotient while improving the park ecology. Our first set of shrubs (pussywillow, itea virginica, and summersweet) is planted around the notable mud hole near the long boardwalk. Please wish our new shrubs health and long life, and do try to steer your dogs away from them while they are getting established if you can!
In addition, our April 15 Wildlife and Respite Garden work day resulted in major gains in our battle against the weeds — also a lot of fun. Later we planted a large number of Black Eyed Susans to brighten up the Wildlife Garden in midsummer.